I’ve been writing about improvisation and the freedom of following the music as you feel at the moment. I was excited to find a great article that summarizes the importance of improvisation, in case you haven’t read it yet, you can find it here.
When I read it, I felt like many others who left comments saying that every dancer should read it. I totally agree; I always felt the greatest joy of dancing when I was able to improvise freely to live music. For me, no choreography can match that feeling. Also, in my understanding, the highest level of the dance art is when you can connect to the music directly, and let it flow right through your body, so you don’t actually make conscious decisions about your dance movements, they just happen, triggered by the music.
As a teacher, I try to pass this feeling on to my students. From the very first class, I try to not only teach a movement, but also the way that movement can connect with the music, and I always encourage my students to just listen to the music and move with it, even if they haven’t learned much technique yet. We spend longer times with each movement, exploring different ways of doing it, like different tempo or range or direction, and then just play around with it for a while. I hope it will help the students to discover that steps and technique are meant to be tools for your free expression, and not for limiting your dance into “appropriate” movements.
I’m not against choreography though. I do use it as a learning tool, and also it’s a good way for group performances and practice. But I think, for solo performances, choreography is not necessary. In my experience, dancers like to use choreographies, because they don’t have self-confidence about their improvising skills, and they think that if they didn’t have a pre-learned set of movements for the specific music, then they could not perform well, and it wouldn’t look good. I think it’s mostly because teachers usually don’t address this topic, many are not an experienced improviser themselves. I admit, choreography can be “safer” than free dance – if you learned your steps well enough, then you don’t really have to work hard to put on a good-looking performance. But that would be more like a skilled craftsman’s work than a creation of art.
I wonder if it works like this: dancers use choreography when they want to dance for an audience, and improvise freely when they dance for themselves. For me, personal feelings are more important in dancing than outside reactions, so I definitely prefer free dance.
I know that improvisation is not easy. Sometimes you worry that you will run out of ideas in the middle of the song, and end up repeating the same four steps all the time. Transitions might be less crispy and clear, and it’s easier to forget about keeping a nice arm posture – at least these are the difficulties I face sometimes when I improvise. But I believe that a passionate, spontaneous interpretation of the music, even if a bit raw here and there, can be more rewarding (for dancer and audience alike) than a choreography perfectly executed, but more detached from the spirit of the moment.
But of course, it’s just my own opinion about this topic. Still, I’m happy to know, that I’m not alone with it. 🙂